Are your retirement savings on track? 7 ways to find out

Summary: You have been building a plan to retire comfortably. However, are you sure your retirement savings are on track? We list seven criteria to help you determine whether your current plan can help you achieve your goal.

Retirement planning is often treated like a hunt for a magic number, a corpus figure that will finally bring peace of mind. But the truth is simpler and more useful: being on track is less about perfection and more about coherence. A good retirement plan holds together from the inside. It begins with an inflation-aware view of future spending, is supported by a realistic funding path and is built to survive bad market years without forcing you into panicked decisions.

The seven criteria below work as a practical diagnostic. Mark each one ‘Green’, ‘Amber’ or ‘Red’. The goal is not to ‘score well’. It is to spot where the plan is fragile.

#1 You have a spending estimate for the first year of retirement, adjusted for inflation

Retirement planning starts with spending, not products. List the essentials (housing, food, utilities), likely additions (healthcare) and discretionary items (travel, hobbies). Then convert today’s monthly spending into a first-year retirement figure by applying an inflation assumption across the years left to retirement.

Green: A written spending estimate, updated at least once a year.
Amber: A number exists, but it is outdated or fails to account for inflation.
Red: No spending estimate, only a vague corpus goal.

#2 Your target corpus is derived from spending and a conservative withdrawal assumption

A corpus is not meaningful in isolation. It should be derived from expected spending and a cautious withdrawal plan that can handle long retirements and poor market periods.

Suggested watch: 100% Equity in Retirement: Risk Check

A useful sanity check is to ask: If markets are weak in the first few years after you retire, will your withdrawal rate force you to sell too much, too soon? If so, the corpus is likely too small for the assumed lifestyle.

Green: The corpus and withdrawal plan are linked to spending and risk capacity.
Amber: The corpus exists, but the withdrawal assumptions are implicit.
Red: Corpus is a round number with no logical basis.

#3 Your current savings and future contributions can plausibly close the gap

Once you have a target, run a simple gap check: current retirement savings plus future monthly investing should plausibly reach the target within the remaining years.

The important word here is ‘plausibly’. If the plan works only under high return assumptions or requires perfect discipline with no interruptions, it is not robust.

Green: Plan still works under average-return assumptions.
Amber: Works only if returns are strong or contributions rise sharply.
Red: Does not work unless retirement is delayed or savings rise materially.

#4 Your asset allocation matches your time horizon and risk capacity

People often judge whether their retirement savings are on track based on the current portfolio value. The more important question is whether the portfolio is built to handle the journey.

Suggested read: How to stay rich after you retire

A practical approach is to separate money needed soon from money needed later. Near-term needs should not rely on volatile assets. Long-term portions need growth potential so inflation does not quietly erode purchasing power.

Green: Allocation is deliberate, written down and tied to timelines.
Amber: Allocation exists but evolved accidentally over time.
Red: Portfolio is concentrated in one asset type with no rationale.

#5 You have a plan for the first few years of retirement cash flows

This is a stress test. If markets fall sharply just before or just after retirement, will you still be able to fund expenses without selling growth assets at depressed prices?

You do not need a complex ‘bucket strategy’ to answer this. You need clarity on what will pay for the first few years of spending and why.

Green: The first few years are funded by relatively stable sources.
Amber: Some stability exists, but you do not know how long it lasts.
Red: Early retirement depends on selling growth assets immediately.

#6 Your plan is diversified across income sources, not just investments

In practice, retirement funding comes from multiple sources. The plan is stronger when you understand the role of each source and do not depend on a single engine.

A simple audit is to list all retirement-linked components and label each as one of three: growth, stability or predictable cash flows. If you cannot label them, the plan may be a collection of products rather than a system.

Green: Each component has a role, and the mix is intentional.
Amber: Multiple components exist, but roles overlap or are unclear.
Red: One component dominates, and failure of that component breaks the plan.

#7 You review and rebalance on a schedule, not in reaction to headlines

A retirement plan becomes off-track slowly, then suddenly. Income changes, expenses rise, markets shift and portfolios drift away from the intended allocation.

Suggested read: How to stop your retirement portfolio from stressing you

A simple annual review is often enough:

• Update expected retirement spending

• Recheck the gap between the target and the current trajectory
• Rebalance if allocation has drifted
• Increase contributions when income rises

Green: Annual review is scheduled and documented.
Amber: Reviews happen occasionally, often after big market moves.
Red: No review process.

If you see two or more reds, your retirement savings are ‘on track’ only if nothing goes wrong. That is not a plan. The fixes usually involve one of four levers: increase contributions, extend the timeline, reduce expected spending or restructure the portfolio to better match time horizons.

To get more such valuable, in-depth insights, keep reading Value Research.

Also read: What should be my retirement corpus?