What most investors miss about commodity funds

Summary: Two commodity-linked products can invest in the same universe and still deliver very different investor experiences. This piece explores why structure—not holdings—shapes risk, volatility, costs and behaviour, and why choosing between active and passive matters more in commodities than it first appears.

At a glance, ICICI Prudential Commodities Fund and ICICI Prudential Commodities ETF appear to be variations of the same idea. Both invest in Indian companies linked to commodities. Both move broadly in line with commodity cycles. Both are affected by global demand, supply disruptions and pricing power.

Yet investors holding these two products often report very different journeys, even over the same market phase.

The reason is not what these schemes invest in, but how that exposure is delivered.

One relies on active judgement. The other follows index rules. That single distinction shapes returns, volatility, costs and investor behaviour far more than most people expect.

First, a crucial clarification

This comparison only makes sense once one misconception is cleared.

Neither the ICICI Prudential Commodities Fund nor the ICICI Prudential Commodities ETF gives direct exposure to commodity prices. Unlike gold or silver ETFs, these products invest in equity shares of commodity-related businesses, not commodities themselves.

The ETF tracks the Nifty Commodities Total Return Index, which consists of companies from sectors such as oil, petroleum products, cement, power, chemical, sugar, metals and mining as per the index factsheet. The active fund operates in the same broad universe, but with the flexibility to choose stocks and weights.

So this is not a commodities vs equities debate. It is a pure active vs passive decision within commodity stocks.

Difference 1: Judgement versus rules

The most important difference lies in how decisions are made.

In the active fund, portfolio weights reflect the fund manager's judgement. Exposure can be increased or reduced based on valuations, cycle position or company-specific factors. The manager can shift emphasis within the commodity value chain or avoid pockets that appear overheated.

In the ETF, decisions are embedded in the index. Sector weights and stock allocations change only when the index methodology dictates. If metals dominate the index at a cycle peak, the ETF remains heavily exposed.

What this changes in practice

Both active and passive management with these funds offer you indirect exposure to commodities; however, with an active fund, you kiss goodbye to a rule-based system, and what you sign up for is to take up the fund manager's risk.

Difference 2: How concentration risk plays out

Commodity indices tend to become concentrated. During strong cycles, a small set of companies can account for a large portion of index weight due to the index's market-cap-weighted nature (though capped in the Nifty Commodity Index).

In a passive structure, this concentration is accepted as part of the design. Investors benefit fully if the dominant stocks continue to perform, but also bear the full risk if the cycle turns.

An active fund can manage this concentration. It can diversify exposure across sub-sectors, reduce dependence on a single commodity theme or rebalance away from crowded trades.

Outcome implication

The ETF offers purity and transparency. The active fund offers the potential to moderate risk, especially near extremes.

Difference 3: Volatility feels different even if returns don't

Commodity-linked stocks are inherently volatile. What differs is how the investor experiences that volatility.

An ETF mirrors index volatility. Drawdowns, rallies and reversals are all transmitted directly.

An active fund may experience lower or differently shaped volatility because of:

• selective stock choices
• varying sector weights
• limited use of cash or defensive positions

This does not guarantee lower volatility, but it can alter the pattern of fluctuations.

This is also evident in the standard deviation figures: 16.66 per cent for the ETF and 14.79 per cent for the active fund. An almost two-percentage-point difference indicates a smoother ride for the actively managed fund.

Why this matters

Investor outcomes are shaped not only by returns but also by the ability to remain invested during adverse phases. Two products with similar long-term returns can yield very different real-world outcomes.

Difference 4: Cost looks simple, but outcomes are not

At first glance, the ETF appears cheaper due to its lower expense ratio. However, investor costs are not limited to those reported in the factsheet.

ETF investors also incur:

• bid–ask spreads
• brokerage costs
• liquidity impact during volatile markets

Active fund investors pay a higher explicit expense ratio but transact at NAV, free of market frictions.

Net effect

For long-term investors who transact infrequently, the cost gap often narrows. For investors who trade or rebalance often, ETF-related leakage can become significant.

Difference 5: Behavioural outcomes

This final difference is subtle but powerful.

ETFs are typically perceived as trading instruments. Their intraday liquidity and price visibility can encourage tactical behaviour, especially in cyclical sectors like commodities.

Active funds, by contrast, tend to be approached as allocations. The structure nudges investors towards longer holding periods and reduces the temptation to react to every price move.

Why this changes outcomes?

Commodity investing fails more often due to poor timing than poor product choice. The structure that helps an investor remain disciplined often determines success.

Which one fits you better?

Rather than asking which product is superior, it is more useful to ask which structure aligns with your behaviour.

The ICICI Prudential Commodities ETF may suit you if you:

• want rules-based exposure
• accept full cycle volatility
• are comfortable with long holding periods

The ICICI Prudential Commodities Fund may suit you if you:

• want some cycle management
• prefer professional management
• view commodities as a diversification tool rather than a trade

A quick self-check before choosing

Before investing, pause and answer these questions honestly:

• Can I tolerate sharp drawdowns without exiting?
• Will I rebalance systematically, or react emotionally?
• Is this allocation long-term or tactical?

Your answers will often matter more than the product label.

The bottom line

The choice between ICICI Prudential Commodities Fund and ICICI Prudential Commodities ETF is not about commodities versus equities, or active versus passive in theory.

It is about how you want to experience commodity cycles. Both schemes invest in the same universe. They simply deliver that exposure in very different ways. Choose the structure that matches your temperament, not your market conviction.

And if you're still unsure, Value Research Fund Advisor can help. It offers personalised recommendations, asset-allocation guidance and expert-curated fund lists to help you invest with clarity and confidence—across categories and styles.

Join Fund Advisor