AI-generated image
Bharti Airtel’s fortunes have multiplied since the telecom shakeout of 2019. That phase of industry consolidation, along with the company’s expansion into digital services—broadband, OTT aggregation, DTH and more—fuelled an exceptionally bullish narrative.
As subscriber numbers grew and India’s ARPU (average revenue per user) remained far below global levels, Airtel was touted as a high-growth opportunity. Its share price soared, and so did its valuation. At the time, the stock’s EV/EBITDA multiple (since P/E was not reliable due to inconsistent profits) hit a multi-year high of over 12 times.
Fast forward six years, and while the business has evolved into a solid cash-generating machine, the narrative hasn’t changed. The stock now trades at a P/E of 40 times and an EV/EBITDA of around 13 times. While these multiples may not appear excessive in isolation, Airtel is by far the most expensive telecom stock globally on this basis.
The question is no longer whether Airtel is a good company—it clearly is. The real question is: does it still deserve the bullish growth narrative? Or are we paying a premium for growth that has already played out?
No room left for ARPU expansion
To begin with, growth from user additions appears largely done. Even Airtel’s own management has acknowledged that mobile subscriber growth has plateaued. The only viable lever left for revenue growth is ARPU expansion.
However, ARPU expansion is not as easy as it is often portrayed. Some compare it to petrol prices—claiming that incremental hikes will be absorbed by users without much resistance. However, this analogy ignores the fundamental nature of telecom: it's a heavily regulated utility. Steep hikes don’t just lead to backlash—they invite regulatory scrutiny. Unlike petrol, telecom pricing cannot be raised at will.
One common defence of the growth narrative is that India’s ARPU is still far lower than in developed markets. That’s true in absolute terms but misses the broader context. ARPU must be seen relative to per capita income. On that front, India’s ARPU adjusted for income is not drastically different from developed countries. When benchmarked to affordability, the “room to grow ARPU” thesis doesn’t hold as much weight.
Is India's ARPU really the lowest?
A global comparison of ARPU normalised by income reveals a different reality
| Country | Monthly ARPU ($) | Annual ARPU ($) | Per Capita Income ($) | ARPU as % of PCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| India | 1.8 | 22 | 2,481 | 0.87 |
| Indonesia | 3.0 | 36 | 4,876 | 0.74 |
| Thailand | 6.3 | 76 | 7,182 | 1.05 |
| China | 7.1 | 85 | 12,614 | 0.68 |
| Malaysia | 10.7 | 128 | 11,379 | 1.13 |
| South Korea | 20.3 | 244 | 33,121 | 0.74 |
| Singapore | 30.1 | 361 | 84,734 | 0.43 |
| US | 34.8 | 418 | 82,769 | 0.50 |
| Canada | 43.7 | 524 | 53,431 | 0.98 |
| Source: Bharti Airtel's investor presentation, World Bank | ||||
Will 5G drive the next leg of growth?
If price hikes are limited, could 5G be the catalyst for a new wave of ARPU growth? Globally, the evidence says otherwise. In mature 5G markets like South Korea and the United States, ARPU growth hasn’t kept pace with 5G penetration. Even as coverage and usage have soared, consumer willingness to pay extra hasn’t followed. In India, the trend looks similar. Adoption is growing, but without meaningful premium pricing or new monetisation models, 5G is unlikely to boost ARPU materially.
5G in the US – where's the ARPU boost?
Despite growing 5G penetration, ARPU in the US remains flat
| Year | ARPU ($) | 5G pentration (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 31.8 | 3 |
| 2021 | 30.5 | 13 |
| 2022 | 30.9 | 39 |
| 2023 | 30.6 | 53 |
| Source: Global Data, GSMA reportson the Mobile Economy | ||
Yes, 5G offers advantages in speed, latency, and network efficiency. But from a user perspective, it doesn’t yet justify higher bills, especially when 4G still meets most needs.
A duopoly isn’t unique
Another argument is that Vodafone Idea’s decline has created a de facto duopoly, giving Airtel (and Jio) pricing power. While there is some merit in this, such concentration is not unique to India. Across the globe, telecom is a concentrated industry. In most major markets, two or three players dominate—yet this hasn’t necessarily translated to high profitability or pricing power.
High industry concentration is not unique to India; it's a global phenomenon
High industry concentration is not unique to India; it's a global phenomenon
| Country | Top operators | Combined market share of top 2-3 (%) |
|---|---|---|
| India | Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel | 74 |
| Indonesia | Telkomsel, Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison, XL Axiata | 95 |
| Thailand | True Corp, AIS, DTAC | 98 |
| China | China Mobile, China Telecom, China Unicom | 100 |
| South Korea | SK Telecom, KT Corp, LG Uplus | 100 |
| Singapore | Singtel, StarHub, M1 | 95 |
| United States | AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile | 90 |
| Canada | Rogers, Bell, Telus | 90 |
So while the structure may be favourable, it does not guarantee industry-leading returns.
Capex moderation: A limited booster
With revenue growth prospects dimming, another hopeful argument is that capex will decline, boosting free cash flows and profitability. Airtel has indicated that FY24 marked peak capex (Rs 40,000 crore) due to front-loaded investments in 5G. Going forward, management expects capex to moderate to 15–17 per cent of revenues. That still translates to Rs 25,000–30,000 crore annually—not exactly light spending.
Telecom remains a capital-hungry business. The nature of investment may shift from expansion to optimisation and enterprise-focused solutions, but the absolute requirement remains high. While free cash flows may improve, the ramp-up will be gradual, not exponential.
Some point to Airtel’s bundled offerings—such as Airtel Black and Xstream—as a strategic edge. These combine mobile, broadband, DTH, and OTT in one plan, aiming to drive stickiness and improve ARPU. But bundling also has costs:
- Licensing premium content (Netflix, Disney+, etc.) adds to expenses.
- Managing multi-service delivery increases complexity and operational overhead.
- The target audience is largely urban and upper-middle class, limiting mass-scale adoption.
Bundling is a useful retention tool, but it’s unlikely to materially shift Airtel’s growth curve.
A utility, not a rocket ship
None of this is to say Airtel is a weak business. On the contrary, in a capital-intensive, tightly regulated industry where most players struggle to stay afloat, Airtel has not only survived—it has thrived. It is now a stable free cash flow generator and a dominant player in the Indian telecom market.
But the issue lies in the valuation. Airtel’s market cap has crossed $130 billion, making it valued amongst several global telecom giants that have larger pools of revenue and profit. For comparison:
- Global incumbents like Verizon, Deutsche Telekom, and NTT have higher ARPUs and larger operations but trade at significantly lower P/E multiples.
- Leave aside multiples for once, look at the absolute valuation size. T-Mobile US, the largest telecom operator in the US and the most valued telecom company in the world, is valued at just twice Airtel’s market cap. This gives a perspective as to how much room for an upside is left with a company like Airtel.
Airtel is the most expensive big telecom stock
Comparing market capitalisation and P/E ratios across global telecom giants
| Company | Country | Market Cap ($ bn) | P/E Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-Mobile US | United States | 276 | 23.7 |
| China Mobile | China | 248 | 13.5 |
| AT&T Inc. | United States | 197 | 18.9 |
| Deutsche Telekom | Germany | 186 | 25.9 |
| Verizon | United States | 181 | 12.7 |
| Bharti Airtel | India | 134 | 40.4 |
| China Telecom | China | 95 | 22.6 |
| NTT (Nippon Telegraph & Telephone) | Japan | 88 | 9.3 |
| Orange S.A. | France | 39 | 13.1 |
| SK Telecom | South Korea | 8 | 7.3 |
This raises the key question: are we paying for the growth that has already happened, or the growth that lies ahead? The evidence suggests the former. Growth prospects today don’t match the heady narrative. If valuations continue to price in yesterday’s story, future returns could disappoint.
Bharti Airtel is no longer the disruptive, underdog challenger it once was. It has matured into a resilient, cash-generating utility, much like global peers in other markets. That is a tremendous achievement. But as with any mature utility, the pace of returns from here is likely to be slower and harder. The company will likely remain dominant and profitable, but the dream run may already be behind us.
Also read: Is Delhivery delivering or dressing up?
This article was originally published on May 31, 2025.
Disclaimer: This content is for information only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation.
For grievances: [email protected]
Top Picks
1 min read•By Abhishek Rana
Welcome to the New Value Research!
2 min read•By Value Research
What if the market gives you nothing for 10 years?
5 min read•By Ujjal Das
4 min read•By Abhishek Rana





