What is your view about investing in dynamic bond funds, as here investors need not worry about the duration of the bond?
Yes, that is the claim of dynamic bond funds. Some funds have been able to do it successfully. But the real problem is associated with the kind of flexibility they have in terms of their interest-rate views. Their calls can well go wrong and we have witnessed it in the last 10 years that, too, during some critical occasions. This is because most of the big moves even in the fixed-income market have come as a surprise, resulting in losses for investors.
So, theoretically, a dynamic bond fund should have emerged as an investment option wherein investors will invest money and the fund manager will take care of it. But in reality, many of the fund managers have not been able to prove their credentials in a full-market cycle. So, I would say that be wary of that.
In my opinion, you have far greater control over the time frame that you have for your fixed-income investment. The downside risk with a fixed-income fund is lower. Further, since you are investing in a fixed-income fund, it shows that you are risk-averse and looking for predictable returns. But these funds may not be a desirable investment option for you, given the scale of volatility involved and the price that you have to pay if the fund manager goes wrong (which has quite often been proven in the last 10 years).
Depending on your investment time frame, you could choose a liquid fund/short-term fund or a high-quality corporate bond fund. Don't move anywhere beyond high-quality. Given the kind of outlook that we are seeing right now, many other fund categories, like gilt funds, look rewarding. But we see extreme volatility in the returns of these funds and thus, they decline in value despite being the safest. So, you must be far more careful and cautious while selecting your fixed-income investment option.