At financial summits, every speaker is selling something

A fund manager’s clip from a recent financial summit went viral. She was making a passionate, almost theatrical case for why India is the greatest investment destination in the world right now. Tens of thousands of views. But the sharpest response was in the comments, just six words: “Never ask a barber if you need a haircut.”

Suggested read: Turning panic into profits

She runs a fund that invests only in Indian equities. Of course, she believes India is the best place to invest. Her livelihood depends on it. This is not a moral failing. It is how incentives work. But the viewer watching that clip on a phone in Pune has no way of knowing that the passionate argument is also, structurally, a sales pitch.

A more interesting moment came from someone else at the same summit. A seasoned market veteran said bluntly that a significant factor in the recent surge in domestic retail money has been the provision of an exit route for foreign institutional investors who wanted out.

Let me put that differently. When FIIs were selling Indian equities in record volumes through 2022 and 2023, someone had to be buying. That buyer was the Indian retail investor: channelled in through SIPs, told that markets always reward patience, parked into products whose immediate job was to absorb supply. The timing is hard to dismiss. Domestic SIP contributions crossed Rs 1.5 lakh crore a year in exactly the period when FII outflows were at their peak.

Suggested read: Are FIIs leaving India?

Retail participation in equities is a good thing. Done right, it is one of the best things that can happen to an Indian household's wealth. But there is a difference between investors entering markets because they understand what they are buying, and investors being guided in because an industry needs someone on the other side of institutional trades. The financialisation of Indian savings has been celebrated by the industry that benefits from it. Whether it has been equally good for the savers is a question that rarely comes up at these summits.

This is not about one speaker. The fund house wants your AUM (assets under management). The broker wants your trading volume. The analyst wants you to notice her call so she can charge more next time. The bearish contrarian taking the dramatic opposing view? He is building a personal brand. Everyone on stage has a reason to be there. That reason is rarely education.

The new investor has no reliable way to see any of this. TV expert, conference panellist, viral clip, WhatsApp forward: none come with a label that says whose interests they serve. Three questions are almost never asked. Is this person paid to say this? Does their income rise if I follow the advice? What do they lose if they are wrong?

So here is a rule worth keeping. When you hear a confident investment argument, especially a passionate one, ask before you act: who is speaking, and what are they selling? The answer will not always disqualify the advice. It will always change how you hear it.

If you want advice that is not shaped by someone else’s sales target, look for a SEBI-registered investment advisor, one who charges a fee and earns nothing from the products recommended. The barber’s advice is free. The haircut is not.

Also read: When free costs you money