The most successful fund manager of all time is a storehouse of ideas on how to invest in stocks
18-Dec-2017 •Dhirendra Kumar
From 1977 to 1990, Peter Lynch, while managing the Fidelity Magellan fund in the US, generated an annualised return of 29.4 per cent, making it the best performing fund in the world. This performance made Lynch a legend in the world of investments, but what truly cemented his role for posterity was the books and articles he wrote about equity investing.
One Up on Wall Street
After all, the money he made for Magellan investors for two decades benefited only those investing in it. His writings, on the other hand, benefited many more, and continue to do so even now. Certainly, my own education in equity investing owes a great deal to an early introduction to Peter Lynch's ideas! Peter Lynch's classic, of course, is the great book One up on Wall Street. Along with his other books, Beating the Street and Learn to Earn and his various articles, Lynch should be read by every investor. As you can probably tell from the titles alone, Lynch firmly believes that ordinary individual investors, by using the information they have access to in their daily lives, can do better than professional investors and fund managers. For a fund manager to espouse this idea is remarkable.
In a somewhat analogous way, despite Value Research being India's premier mutual fund research organisation, our new Value Research Stock Advisor service is based on the firm belief that for a certain class of committed investors, investing directly in equities makes sense.
However, there's a lot more to Peter Lynch in terms of ideas than just that. The other day, I came across one of the articles he wrote for Worth magazine in 1997. It's a long article, covering a lot of ground and should be read closely by anyone investing in stocks.
This article, 'Use Your Edge', starts with Lynch describing the idea:
Amateurs can beat the Street because, well, they're amateurs.
At the risk of repeating myself, I'm convinced that this type of failure is unnecessary -- that amateurs can not only succeed on their own but beat the Street by (a) taking advantage of the fact that they are amateurs and (b) taking advantage of their personal edge. Almost everyone has an edge. It's just a matter of identifying it.
While a fund manager is more or less forced into owning a long list of stocks, an individual has the luxury of owning just a few. This means you can afford to be choosy and invest only in outfits that you understand and that have a superior product or franchise with clear opportunities for expansion. You can wait until the company repeats its successful formula in several places or markets (same-store sales on the rise, earnings on the rise) before you buy the first share.
A Handful of Winners
If you put together a portfolio of five to ten of these high achievers, there's a decent chance one of them will turn out to be a 10-, a 20-, or even a 50-bagger, where you can make 10, 20, or 50 times your investment. With your stake divided among a handful of issues, all it takes is a couple of gains of this magnitude in a lifetime to produce superior returns.
One of the oldest sayings on Wall Street is "Let your winners run, and cut your losers." It's easy to make a mistake and do the opposite, pulling out the flowers and watering the weeds. Warren Buffett quoted me on this point in one of his famous annual reports (as thrilling to me as getting invited to the White House). If you're lucky enough to have one golden egg in your portfolio, it may not matter if you have a couple of rotten ones in there with it. Let's say you have a portfolio of six stocks. Two of them are average, two of them are below average, and one is a real loser. But you also have one stellar performer. Your Coca-Cola, your Gillette. A stock that reminds you why you invested in the first place. In other words, you don't have to be right all the time to do well in stocks. If you find one great growth company and own it long enough to let the profits run, the gains should more than offset mediocre results from other stocks in your portfolio.
Look around you for good stocks. Down the road, you won't regret it.
A lot of people mistakenly think they must search far and wide to find a company with this sort of potential. In fact, many such companies are hard to ignore. They show up down the block or inside the house. They stare us in the face.
This is where it helps to have identified your personal investor's edge. What is it that you know a lot about? Maybe your edge comes from your profession or a hobby. Maybe it comes just from being a parent. An entire generation of Americans grew up on Gerber's baby food, and Gerber's stock was a 100-bagger. If you put your money where your baby's mouth was, you turned $10,000 into $1 million. Fifty-baggers like Home Depot, Wal-Mart, and Dunkin' Donuts were obvious success stories to large crowds of do-it-yourselfers, shoppers, and policemen. Mention any of these at a party, though, and you're likely to get the predictable reaction: "Chances like that don't come along anymore."
Ah, but they do.
Lynch then moves on to how people 'fake themselves' out of making good money, even after identifying companies they want to invest in. Here is the part where most of the investors slip up. In my experience, Indian investors too make the same mistakes. They either wait too long for stock prices to fall before picking them up or fail to predict the growth story of a company.
There are ways you can keep yourself from gaining on the good growth companies.
There are two ways investors can fake themselves out of the big returns that come from great growth companies.
The first is waiting to buy the stock when it looks cheap. Throughout its 27-year rise from a split-adjusted 1.6 cents to $23, Wal-Mart never looked cheap compared with the overall market. Its price-to-earnings ratio rarely dropped below 20, but Wal-Mart's earnings were growing at 25 to 30 percent a year. A key point to remember is that a p/e of 20 is not too much to pay for a company that's growing at 25 percent. Any business that can manage to keep up a 20 to 25 percent growth rate for 20 years will reward shareholders with a massive return even if the stock market overall is lower after 20 years.
The second mistake is underestimating how long a great growth company can keep up the pace. In the 1970s I got interested in McDonald's. A chorus of colleagues said golden arches were everywhere and McDonald's had seen its best days. I checked for myself and found that even in California, where McDonald's originated, there were fewer McDonald's outlets than there were branches of the Bank of America. McDonald's has been a 50-bagger since.
These "nowhere to grow" stories come up quite often and should be viewed skeptically. Don't believe them until you check for yourself. Look carefully at where the company does business and at how much growing room is left.
Finally, Lynch sums up the distilled learning of everything he believes in.
So, what advice would I give to someone with $1 million to invest? The same I'd give to any investor: Find your edge and put it to work by adhering to the following rules:
Figuring out how to start doing this for yourself? Look no further than our new premium service, Value Research Stock Advisor.