Factor Insight

Smart-beta mutual funds vs smart-beta ETFs

How similar-sounding strategies can deliver different outcomes

Smart-beta mutual funds vs smart-beta ETFs

Over the past few years, 'smart beta' has become one of the most talked-about innovations in investment management. It promises the best of both worlds - the discipline of passive investing and the targeted performance of active strategies. And for good reason - investors increasingly realise that while traditional active funds struggle with consistency, pure passive funds don't always optimise for performance. Smart beta seeks to bridge that gap. At its core, smart beta is a rules-based investment strategy that selects and weighs stocks using factors such as value, momentum, quality, size or low volatility - rather than just market capitalisation. Unlike traditional passive funds, which simply follow the market, smart-beta funds apply intelligent filters to build more efficient portfolios. The result is a strategy that remains transparent and disciplined, like indexing, but with the potential to outperform, much like active management - only without the guesswork. However, two very different approaches have emerged under this umbrella: passive smart beta and active smart beta. While they share a foundation in factor investing, their structure, philosophy and performance potential vary significantly. Understanding the differences is key to making the right choice. Understand

This story is not available as it is from the Mutual Fund Insight May 2025 issue

Read other available articles